La funzione antropologica e sociale della psicoanalisi
Abstract
Silvia Montefoschi pensava la psicoanalisi come strumento per una rivoluzione socio-economica.
Essendo una scienza umanistica che apprende dall’essere umano, agendo su e con altri esseri umani, non può essere cieca al sistema politico ed economico in cui sia analista che paziente stanno vivendo.
Anche se tipicamente il contesto sociale ed economico sono presi in considerazioni per il singolo paziente, questi due contesti non sono mai stati analizzati in una visione teorica più ampia. Questa potrebbe fornire uno strumento filosofico per riflettere sui condizionamenti impliciti ai quali sono stati assoggettati i pazienti nel capitalismo occidentale contemporaneo e sugli effetti che potrebbe avere sulle relazioni oggettuali.
Freud stesso utilizzò concetti economici e politici nella creazione del suo primo modello della mente umana: l’homo oeconomicus. È interessante notare come il sistema psichico da lui teorizzato si sarebbe concluso nell’entropia se l’uomo non fosse nel suo ambiente sociale, che è causa di conflitti, ma lo porta a sviluppare il principio di realtà.
Tramite il pensiero Marxista, il percorso sociale che l’homo oeconomicus ha affrontato per arrivare al capitalismo occidentale moderno (e non più esclusivamente occidentale), diventa più chiaro.
Le complesse interdipendenze volute e causate da una società capitalistica sono terreno fertile dal quale derivano i problemi relazionali contemporanei dell’oggettificazione, la mancanza di empatia e le loro conseguenze.
Keyword
Full Text
PDF (English)Riferimenti bibliografici
Abram, J. (2004). The Survival of the Object: Does Winnicott’s Work Constitute a Paradigm Shift in Psychoanalysis? Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Middlesex. UK.
Atwood, G. E., & Stolorow, R. D. (1984). Structures of Subjectivity: Explorations in Psychoanalytic Phenomenology and Contextualism. New York: Routledge.
Atwood, G. E., & Stolorow, R. D. (1993). Faces in a Cloud: Intersubjectivity in Personality Theory. Northvale: Jason Aronson, Inc
Atwood, G. E., Orange, D. M., & Stolorow, R. D., (2010) Shattered Worlds/Psychotic States: A Post-Cartesian View of the Experience of Personal Annihilation. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 19 (2), 281-306.
Atwood, G. E., & Stolorow, R. D. (2011) The Madness and Genius of Post-Cartesian Philosophy: A Distant Mirror. Psychoanalytic Review, 98 (3), 363-285.
Atwood, G. E. (2012). The Abyss of Madness. New York: Routledge.
Bacon, F. (1911). Novum Organum. Devey, J., Ed., P.F. New York: Collier & Son.
Beebe, B. (2004). Faces in Relation: A Case Study. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 14 (1), 1-51.
Benjamin, J. (1995). Like Subjects, Love Objects: Essays on Recognition and Sexual Difference. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Benjamin, J. (2004). Beyond Doer and Done to: An Intersubjective View of Thirdness. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly Journal, 73 (1), 5-46.
Brandchaft, B. (2010). Towards an Emancipatory Psychoanalysis. New York: Routledge.
Bryson, N. (1988). The Gaze in the Expanded Field. In Vision and Visuality. Foster, H. (Ed.). (pp. 87-113). Seattle: Bay Press.
Cassirer, E. (1957). The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. Volume three: the phenomenology of knowledge. Ralph Manheim (Trans.). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Cooper, A., & Lousada, J. (2010). The shock of the real: Psychoanalysis, modernity, survival. In: Off the couch: Contemporary psychoanalytic applications. (pp. 33-45). London: Taylor & Francis.
Duranti, A. (2010). Husserl, Intersubjectivity, and Anthropology. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Etchegoyen, H. R. (1991). The Fundamentals of Psychoanalytic Technique. Revised Edition (1999). London: Karnac Books.
Freud, S. (1916). Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. Parts I, II., S.E., 15, 9-239.
Freud, S. (1940a [1938]). An Outline of Psycho-Analysis. S.E., 23.
Friedman, L. (1988). The Anatomy of Psychotherapy. New York: Routledge.
Groddeck, G. (1966). Il Libro dell’Es. Lettere di Psicoanalisi ad un’Amica. XII ed. Milan: Adelphi.
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time. New York: HarperCollins.
Herzog, P. (1988). The Myth of Freud as Anti-Philosopher. In Stepansky, P. E. (Ed.). Freud: Appraisals and Reappraisals. (pp. 163-189). Hillsdale: Analytic Press.
Husserl, E. (1910). Philosophy as Rigorous Science. Trans. in Lauer, Q. (Ed.). (1965). Phenomenology and the Crisis of Philosophy, New York: Harper.
Husserl, E. (1931). Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. Gibson, W.R.B. (Trans.) (2012). New York: Routledge.
Husserl, E. (1969). Formal and Transcendental Logic. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Husserl, E. (1970). The Crisis of European Science and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Jaspers, K. (1986). Basic Philosophical Writings, Selections. In L. H. Ehrlich, E. Ehrlich, G. B. Pepper (Trans.). (1994). University Press: Ohio. xiii & 556. Amherst: Humanity Books.
Lacan, J. (1949). Le Stade du Miroir comme Formateur de la Fonction du Je telle qu’elle Nous est Revelee dans l’Experience Psychoanalytique. In: J. Lacan, & J. A. Miller, (Eds.). (1966). Ecrits (pp. 93-100). Paris: Le Seuil.
Lacan, J. (1953a). Some reflections on the ego. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 34 (1), 11-17.
Lacan, J. (1964a). Le Seminaire de Jacques Lacan. Vol XI: Les quatre concepts fondamentaux de la psychanalyse. Paris: Le Seuil. (1988). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book 2: The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lacan, J. (1977 [1973]). The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-analysis. Sheridan, A. (Trans.). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Lalli, N. (1988). Le Psiconevrosi: Fenomenologia e Psicodinamica. Roma: Editrice Universitaria di Roma.
Liddell & Scott. (1996). A Greek – English Lexicon. Oxford: Claredon Press.
Lukács, G. (1991). Storia e coscienza di classe. Piana, G (Trans). (1968). Geschichte und Klassenbewußtsein.Studien über Marxistische Dialektik. (pp. 108-120). Milano: SugarCo.
Marx, K. (1859). Grundrisse: Outlines of the Critique of Political Economy. Nicolaus, M. (Trans. Eng. London: Penguin. 1973).
Meredith-Owen, W. (2013). Are Waves of Relational Assumptions Eroding Traditional Analysis? Journal of Analytical Psychology, 58 (5), 593–614.
Miller, H. W. (1949). Philosophy and Medicine in Ancient Greece. The Classical Association of the Middle West and South, 44 (5), 309-318
Montefoschi, S. (1977). L’Uno e L’Altro: Interdipendenza e Intersoggettivita’ nel Rapporto Psicoanalitico. Genova: Laboratorio di Ricerche Evolutive.
Odorn, A. (1995). Secondary and College Biology Students’ Misconceptions About Diffusion and Osmosis. The American Biology Teacher, 57 (7), 409-415.
Orange, D. M. (1995). Emotional Understanding: Studies in Psychoanalytic Epistemology. New York: The Guilford Press.
Orange, D. M., Atwood, G. E., & Stolorow, R. D. (1997) Working Intersubjectively: Contextualism in Psychoanalytic Practice. Hillsdale: The Analytic Press.
Orange, D. M. (2010). Thinking for Clinicians: Philosophical Resources for Contemporary Psychoanalysis and the Humanistic Psychotherapies. New York: Routledge.
Sandler, J. Holder, A. Dare, C. & Dreher, A. U. (1997). Freud’s Models of the Mind: An introduction. London: Karnac Books.
Schact, L. (1981). The mirroring function of the child analyst. Journal of Child Psychotherapy, 7 (1), 79-88.
Schutz, A. (1967). The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Stolorow, R. D., (1997). Dynamic, Dyadic, Intersubjective Systems: An Evolving Paradigm for Psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 14 (3), 337-34.
Stolorow, R. D., (2011) From Mind to World, From Drive to Affectivity: A Phenomenological-Contextualist Psychoanalytic Perspective. New Directions in Psychotherapy and Relational Psychoanalysis, 5 (1), 1–14.
Stolorow, R. D. (2012). The Renewal of Humanism in Psychoanalytic Therapy. Psychotherapy American Psychological Association, 49 (4), 442–444.
Stolorow, R. D., (2013). Intersubjective-Systems Theory: A Phenomenological-Contextualist Psychoanalytic Perspective. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 23 (4), 383–389.
Studio 12. (2010). Intervista a Silvia Montefoschi. Sarzana, Liguria. RetrievedOctober 26, 2014, from http://www.studio12-milano.it/index.php?Itemid=149&id=119&option=com_content&view=article
Freud, S. (1916). Vorlesungen Zur Einfuhrung in die Psychoanalyse. (Trad. It. Introduzione allo Studio della Psicoanalisi. Roma: Astrolabio. 1947).
Winnicott, D. W. (1956). On transference. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 37, 386-388.
Winnicott, D. W. (1967). Mirror-Role of Mother and Family in Child Development. In P. Lomas (Ed.). (1971). The Predicament of the Family: A Psycho-analytical Symposium. London: Hogarth Press.
Refback
- Non ci sono refbacks, per ora.
ISSN: 2035-4630, Open-acess, peer-reviewed Journal, Tribunale di Roma 142/09, 04/05/09 - dir. responsabile: G. Colajacomo
Creative Commons - BY-NC-SA 4.0
