La funzione dei confini e della liminalità nei processi narrativi. Una discussione semiotico-dinamica

Raffaele De Luca Picione

Abstract


La proposta dell’autore sviluppa le nozioni di confine e di liminalità in riferimento ai processi narrativi in una prospettiva dinamica. Approfondendo e connettendo contributi diversi provenienti dalla semiotica, dalla psicologia culturale, dalla psicoanalisi e dall’antropologia, la discussione si concentra sulla dinamica di stabilizzazione/trasformazione delle narrazioni attraverso i confini. Viene proposta difatti una concettualizzazione della nozione di confine come un dispositivo semiotico che consente simultaneamente processi di differenziazione, distanziamento ma anche connessione e integrazione. I confini quali dispositivi plastici dotati di grande sensibilità contestuale e locale possono accelerare/decelerare le trasformazioni e i cambiamenti, generando condizioni e processi di liminalità spazio-temporale, tipici di ogni processo psicologico in divenire, dove il “vecchio” perde la propria consistenza ed il “nuovo” è ancora a venire, le identità diventano fumose e perdono di definizione generando effetti paradossali, la differenza dentro/fuori perde consistenza. Attraverso l’oscillazione dinamica tra stabilizzazione e riconfigurazione dei confini, nuove storie divengono possibili.

Keyword


Liminalità; confine semiotico; narrazione; trasformazione; processo di significazione; semiotica; psicoanalisi

Full Text

PDF

Riferimenti bibliografici


Bakhtin, M. (1968). Rabelais and His World. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Bakhtin, M.M. (1981). The Dialogical Imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Bamberg, M. (2011a). Who am I? Narration and its contribution to self and identity. Theory & Psychology, 21(1), 3-24.

Bamberg, M. (2011b). Narrative discourse. In C.A. Chapelle (General Ed.), The encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 1-6

Barthes, R. (1964). Rhétorique de l'image. Communications, 4(1), 40-51.

Bateson, G. (1935). Culture Contact and Schismogenesis. Man, 178-183.

Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: a necessary unity. New York: Dutton.

Bion W.R, (1972). Apprendere dall'esperienza. Roma, Armando.

Bion W.R. (1970). Una teoria del pensiero. In: Analisi degli schizofrenici e metodo psicoanalitico. Roma, Armando.

Bion, W. R. (1970). Il gemello immaginario. In Analisi degli schizofrenici e metodo psicoanalitico. Roma, Armando.

Bion, W. R. (1995). Note su memoria e desiderio. In Bott Spillius E.(ed), Melanie Klein e il suo impatto sulla psicoanalisi oggi. Roma: Astrolabio.

Blows, E., Bird, L., Seymour, J., & Cox, K. (2012). Liminality as a framework for understanding the experience of cancer survivorship: a literature review. Journal of advanced nursing, 68(10), 2155-2164.

Brockmeier J. (1995). The language of human temporality: narrative schemes and cultural meanings of time. Mind, Culture and Activity, 2 (2): 102-118.

Bruner J (1986). Actual Minds, Possible Words. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

Bruner J. (1990). Acts of Meaning. Cambridge. Mass: Harvard University Press.

Bruner, J. (1987). Life as narrative. Social research, 54, 11-32.

Bruner, J. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical inquiry, 18(1), 1-21.

Bühler K. (1934). Spachteorie. Die Darstellungs funktion der Sprache. [Theory of Language]. Jena: Fischer.

Cunha, C. A. C., Gonçalves, M. M., & Valsiner, J. (2011). Transforming self-narratives in psychotherapy: Looking at different forms of ambivalence in the change process. In Jungian and dialogical self perspectives.

De Angelis, V. (1996). La logica della complessità: introduzione alle teorie dei sistemi. Milano: Bruno Mondadori.

De Luca Picione, R, Freda, M. F. (2012). Senso e Significato. Rivista di Psicologia Clinica. N.2 – 2012. Pp. 17-26.

De Luca Picione, R. & Valsiner, J. (2017). Psychological functions of semiotic borders in sensemaking: Liminality of narrative processes. Europe’s Journal of Psychology.

De Luca Picione, R. (2015a). La Mente come Forma. La Mente come Testo. Un’indagine semiotico-psicologica sui processi di significazione. Milano. Mimemis Edizioni.

De Luca Picione, R. (2015a). The Idiographic Approach in Psychological Research. The Challenge of Overcoming Old Distinctions Without Risking to Homogenize. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 49(3), 360-370.

De Luca Picione, R., & Freda, M. F. (2014). Catalysis and Morphogenesis: The Contextual Semiotic Configuration of Form, Function, and Fields of Experience. In Cabell, K. R., and Valsiner, J. (Eds.) (2014). The catalyzing mind. Beyond models of causality. Annals of Theoretical Psychology. Vol.11. pp. 149-163. New York: Springer.

De Luca Picione, R., Freda, M. F. (2016a). The processes of meaning making, starting from the morphogenetic theories of Rene´ Thom. Culture and Psychology. Vol. 22 (1), 139-157.

De Luca Picione, R., Freda, M. F. (2016b). Borders and Modal Articulations. Semiotic Constructs of Sensemaking Processes Enabling a Fecund Dialogue Between Cultural Psychology and Clinical Psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50, 29–43.

De Luca Picione, & Freda, M. F. (2016). Possible use in psychology of threshold concept in order to study sensemaking processes. Culture & Psychology, 22(3), 362–375.

De Luca Picione, R., Luisa Martino, M., & Freda, M. F. (2016). Understanding Cancer Patients’ Narratives: Meaning-Making Process, Temporality, and Modal Articulation. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 1-21.

Foucault, M. (1984). Des espaces autres. In Dits et écrits. Paris: Gallimard, 1994, vol. IV: 752-762.

Foucault, M. (2004). Utopies et hétérotopies. CD audio. Paris: INA.

Freda M.F. & De Luca Picione R. (2014). The identity as a system of translation of the boundary between subject and context. In: S. Salvatore, A. Gennaro, J. Valsiner (eds), Multicentric Identities in Globalizing World. Yearbook of Idiographic Science, vol. V. Pp. 179-183. Information Age Publishing, Charlotte (NC).

Freda, M. F. & De Luca Picione, R., (2013). Cornici ermeneutiche della narrazione e sviluppo della riflessività nel dialogo clinico. Rivista di Psichiatria e Psicoterapia, 32, 4, pagg. 250-262.

Freda, M. F. (2011). Understanding continuity to recognize discontinuity. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science. 45,335-346.

Freda, M. F., De Luca Picione, R., Martino, M.L. (2015). Time of Illness and Illness of Time. In L. M. Simão, D. S. Guimarães and J. Valsiner (Eds). Temporality: Culture in the Flow of Human Experience. Charlotte (NC): Information Age Publishing. pp. 209-234.

Freud, S. (1919), Il Perturbante. O.S.F. IX. Boringhieri, Torino.

Freud, S. (1922). L’Io e l’Es. OSF, vol. IX. Boringhieri, Torino.

Gadamer, H.G.(2000). Subjectivity and Intersubjectivity, Subject and Person. Continental Philosophy Review 33, 285.

Gennep, A. v. (1960). The rites of passage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Gonçalves, M. M., Matos, M., & Santos, A. (2009). Narrative therapy and the nature of innovative moments in the construction of change. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 22, 1–23.

Greimas, A. J. (1983). Structural semantics: An attempt at a method. University of Nebraska Press.

Harré, R., & van Langenhove, L. (1991). Varieties of positioning. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 21, 393-407.

Heft, H. (2013). Environment, cognition, and culture: Reconsidering the cognitive map. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 33, 14-25.

Herbst, D. P. (1995). What happens when we make a distinction: an elementary introduction to co-genetic logic. In T. A. Kinderman & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Development of person-context relations (pp. 67–82). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hermans, H. J. M., & Kempen, H. J. G. (1993). The dialogical self: Meaning as movement. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Hoffman, I. Z. (1998). Ritual and spontaneity in the psychoanalytic process: A dialectical–constructivist view. London, New York: Routledge.

Hoffman, I.Z. (1992). Some Practical Implications of a Social-Constructivist View of the Psychoanalytic Situation. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 2(3), 287-304.

Kaës, R. (2007). Un singolare plurale. Roma: Borla.

Kull, K. (2009). Vegetative, animal, and cultural semiosis: the semiotic threshold zones. Cognitive Semiotics, 4, 8-27.

Lacan, J. (2004). Le séminaire, Livre X, L’angoisse. Paris: Seuil.

Levinas, E. (1996). Emmanuel Levinas: basic philosophical writings. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Little M., Jordens C., Paul K., Montgomery K. & Philipson B. (1998) Liminality: a major category of the experience of cancer illness. Social Science & Medicine, 47(10), 1485–1494.

Lotman, J. (2005). On the semiosphere. Sign Systems Studies 33.1, 205-229.

Lotman, J. (2009). Culture and Explosion. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

Marsico, G. (2011). The ‘Non-cuttable’ space in between: context, boundaries and their natural fluidity. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 45(2), 185–193.

Marsico, G. (2013). General conclusion: moving between the social spaces: conditions for boundaries crossing. In M. Giuseppina, K. Koji, & I. Antonio (Eds.), Crossing boundaries. crossing boundaries. Intercontextual dynamics between family and school (pp. 361–374). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

Marsico, G. (2016). The borderland. Culture & Psychology, 22(2), 206-215.

Marsico, G., Cabell, K. R., Valsiner, J., & Kharlamov, N. A. (2013). Interobjectivity as a border: the fluid dynamics of Betweenness. In G. Sammut, P. Daanen, & F. Moghaddam (Eds.), Understanding the self and others: explorations in intersubjectivity and interobjectivity. London: Routledge.

Martino, M. L., Picione, R. D. L., & Freda, M. F. (2016). La ferita del confine: la condizione di liminalità del corpo e della psiche. La camera blu. Rivista di studi di genere, 14, 165-194.

Nail, T. (2016). Theory of the Border. Oxford University Press.

Navon L. & Morag A. (2004). Liminality as biographical disruption: unclassifiability following hormonal therapy for advanced prostate cancer. Social Science & Medicine, 58(11), 2337–2347.

Neuman, Y. (2003). Process and boundaries of the mind. New York: Kluwer Acadmic/Plenum.

Peirce, C. S. (1935). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Polkinghorne, D.E. (1998). Narrative Knowing and the human science. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

Roussillon, R. (1991). Spazi e Pratiche istituzionali. Il ripostiglio e l’interstizio. In Kaes R., Bleger J., Eugene Enriquez, F. Fornari, Fustier P., Roussillon R., Vidal J.P. (edts). L’istituzione e le istituzioni. Roma: Ed. Borla.

Salvatore, S. (2013). The reciprocal inherency of self and context. Notes for a semiotic model of the constitution of experience. Interacções, 9, 24, 20-50

Salvatore, S. (2016). Psychology in black and white: The project of a theory-driven science. Charlotte, NC: IAP.

Salvatore, S., & Freda, M. F. (2011). Affect, unconscious and sensemaking: a psychodynamic, semiotic and dialogic model. New Ideas in Psychology, 29, 119–135.

Salvatore, S., & Venuleo, C. (2017). Liminal transitions in a semiotic key: The mutual in-feeding between present and past. Theory & Psychology, 27(2), 215-230.

Salvatore, S., & Zittoun, T. (2011). Cultural psychology and psychoanalysis: Pathways to synthesis. Charlotte, NC: IAP.

Sarbin, T.R. (1986). Narrative Psychology. The storied nature of human conduct. New York: Praeger.

Schafer, R. (1992). Retelling a life: Narration and dialogue in psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books.

Sebeok, T. A. (1986). I think I Am a Verb. More Contributions to the Doctrine of Signs. New York: Plenum.

Sebeok, T. A., & Danesi, M. (2000). The Forms of Meaning: Modeling Systems Theory and Semiotic Analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Sharpless, B. A., & Barber, J. P. (2011). Lifetime prevalence rates of sleep paralysis: a systematic review. Sleep medicine reviews, 15(5), 311-315.

Simão, L. M. (2007). Why 'otherness 'in the research domain of semiotic-cultural psychology? In S. Lívia Mathias & V. Jaan (Eds.), Otherness in question: labyrinths of the self (pp. 11–35). Charlotte, NC: IAP

Simão, L. M. (2016). Culture as a moving symbolic border. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50(1), 14-28.

Simmel, G. (1994). Bridge and door. Theory Culture Society, 11(5), 5–10.

Simmel, G. (2007). The social boundary. Theory Culture Society, 24(7–8), 5–10.

Spence, D.P. (1982). Narrative truth and historical truth: Meaning and interpretation in psychoanalysis. New York: Norton.

Tarsi, P. P., & Salvatore, S. (2012). From minimal self to self as hyper-generalized sign. Notes for an integrated model of subjectivity. Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia, 4(1), 11–21.

Thompson K. (2007). Liminality as a descriptor for the cancer experience. Illness, Crisis, & Loss 15(4), 333–351.

Traini, S. (2013). Le basi della semiotica. Milano: Bompiani.

Turner V. (1969) The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. London: Routledge.

Turner, V., Harris, J. C., & Park, R. J. (1983). Liminal to liminoid, in play, flow, and ritual: an essay in comparative symbology. Play, games and sports in cultural contexts, 123-164.

Valsiner, J. & De Luca Picione, R. (2017). La regolazione dinamica dei processi affettivi attraverso la mediazione semiotica. Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia. 8, (1), 80-109.

Valsiner, J. (2002). Irreversibility of time and ontopotentiality of signs. Estudios de Psicología, 23(1), 49–59.

Valsiner, J. (2007). Culture in minds and societies. Foundation of cultural psychology. New Delhi: Sage Publications.

Valsiner, J. (2014). An invitation to cultural psychology. London: Sage.

Van Gennep A. (1960) The Rites of Passage. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.

Winnicott, D. W. (1953). Transitional Objects and Transitional Phenomena - A Study of the First Not-Me Possession. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 34, 89-97.


Refback

  • Non ci sono refbacks, per ora.


Bookmark and Share


ISSN: 2035-4630, Open-acess, peer-reviewed Journal, Tribunale di Roma 142/09, 04/05/09 - dir. responsabile: G. Colajacomo

   Creative Commons - BY-NC-SA 4.0