Anxiety and Fragile Learning
Abstract
Learning in Higher Education is a fragile system of conscious and unconscious transactions that serve to weaken a process that is already precarious. This paper argues that learning is brittle by nature, and easily broken. Using a wide range of examples, the Fragile Learner is described as someone who is close to conceding defeat to circumstances that threaten his or her education. For the purposes of this submission, the Fragile Learner might be a student of a Higher Education Institution, but also might be an appointed educator – a lecturer or personal tutor. Fragile Learners might experience anxieties that are internal and complex – a shared attitude of wilful self-defeat, coupled with an arrangement of ready-made prejudices – which can appear to be attacks from other people. For example, anxiety creates an internal threat which presents itself as a threat from the outside. Alternatively, Fragile Learning might be a consequence of learners having suffered illness or indisposition. Alongside notions of barriers to learning and resilience, this paper explores roles and identities and the tensions that inevitably occur. Although some of the ideas that make up my picture of Fragile Learning have been researched by other contributors (notably Meyer and Land, 2006; Britzman, 2009; Hoult, 2012 & 2013), this paper views the complexities through different sets of psychoanalytic lenses. This paper is specific to adult learners (18+), and references to school children or students in institutions of Further Education are beyond its reach.
Keyword
Full Text
PDF (English)Riferimenti bibliografici
Alford, C. F. (1998). Freud and Violence. In: A. Elliot (Ed.), Freud 2000. London: Polity Press, pp. 61–87.
Bayne, S. (2005). Deceit, desire and control: the identities of learners and teachers in cyberspace. In: R. Land & S. Bayne (Eds.) Education in Cyberspace. Abingdon, Oxon: RoutledgeFalmer, 2005, pp 26-42.
Bion, W. R. (1967). Second Thoughts. London: William Heinemann. [Reprinted London: Karnac Books, 1984].
Bion, W.R. (1979) Making the Best of a Bad Job. In: Clinical Seminars and Other Works, pp. 321-332. London: Karnac, 1994.
Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Promoting reflection in learning: a model. In: D. Boud, R. Keogh, & D. Walker (Eds.), Turning Experience into Learning, pp. 18-40. London. Kogan Page.
Britzman, D.P. (2009). The Very Thought of Education: Psychoanalysis and the Impossible Professions. Albany NY: SUNY Press.
Carey, S. (1986). Cognitive Conflict Science and Science Education. American Psychologist 41(10):1123 • October 1986.
Copjec, J. (2006). May ‘68, The Emotional Month. In: S. Žižek (Ed.) Lacan: The Silent Partners. London: Verso, pp. 90-114.
Ecclestone, K. (2008). The rise of the ‘fragile’ learner. Teaching News. Available at: https://wiki.brookes.ac.uk/display/teachingnews/The+rise+of+the+’fragile’+learner. Last accessed: 12 April 2016.
Ecclestone, K. (2010). Transforming Formative Assessment In Lifelong Learning. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
Ecclestone, K. & Hayes, D. (2009). The Dangerous Rise of Therapeutic Education. London: Routledge.
Domjan, M. (1998) The Principles of Learning and Behavior Fourth Edition. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
Freud, S. (1911-1915). Papers on Technique. In: Strachey, J. (Ed.), The Complete Works of Sigmund Freud Vol. 12. London, UK: Hogarth.
Freud, S. (1911). Formulations on the two principles of mental functioning. Vol. 12 215-226.
Freud, S. (1926). Inhibitions, Symptoms and Anxiety. In Strachey, J. (Ed.), The Complete Works of Sigmund Freud Vol. 20 (pp. 77–174). London, UK: Hogarth.
Hattie, J. (2012). Visible Learning for Teachers: Maximising Impact on Learning. London: Routledge.
Hoult, E.C. (2012). Adult Learning and la Recherche Féminine. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hoult, E.C. (2013). Resilience in Adult Learners: some pedagogical implications. Journal of Pedagogic Development Volume 3 Issue 1, p. 46.
Klein, M. (1975). Envy and Gratitude. London, UK: The Hogarth Press.
Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (Vol. 1). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Lacan, J. (2014). Anxiety. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan Book X. Ed. J-A. Miller. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Meltzer, D. (1967). The Psycho-Analytical Process. Perthshire, Scotland: The Clunie Press.
Meltzer, D., & Harris, M. (1976). A psychoanalytic model of the child-inthe-family-in-the-community. In: Sincerity and Other Works: Collected Papers of Donald Meltzer. London: Karnac, 1994.
Meltzer, D. (1978). The Kleinian Development Part I. Perthshire, Scotland: Clunie Press.
Meltzer, D. (1994). Sincerity and Other Works. London: Karnac Books.
Meyer, J.H.F. & Land, R. (2006). Overcoming Barriers to Student Understanding: Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge. London: Routledge.
Oakeshott, M. (1962). The Voice of Poetry in the Conversation of Mankind. Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays. London: Methuen, 1962: 197-247.
Reay, D. & William, D. (1999). ‘I’ll be a nothing’: structure, agency and the construction of identity through assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 25: 343-54.
Reber, A.S. (1985). The Penguin Dictionary of Psychology. London: Penguin Books.
Rycroft, C. (1979). The Innocence of Dreams. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stanton, M. (1983). Outside the Dream: Lacan and French Styles of Psychoanalysis. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd.
Sfard, A. (1998). On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing Just One. Educational Researcher, Vol. 27, No. 2.
Stobart, G. (2014). The Expert Learner. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
Thomas, L. & Quinn, J. (2007). First Generation Entry into Higher Education. Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press.
Waterfield, R. (Trans.) (1992). On Listening. In: Essays by Plutarch, pp. 27-51. London and New York: Penguin Classics.
Woodhouse, D. & Pengelly, P. (1991). Anxiety and the Dynamics of Collaboration. Aberdeen, Scotland: Aberdeen University Press.
Žižek, S. (2006). The Parallax View. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Refback
- Non ci sono refbacks, per ora.
ISSN: 2035-4630, Open-acess, peer-reviewed Journal, Tribunale di Roma 142/09, 04/05/09 - dir. responsabile: G. Colajacomo
Creative Commons - BY-NC-SA 4.0