Energy-Information Exchange Approach to the Ethics Web Regulation
Abstract
- Purpose of research is rethinking the basic legal concepts in view of two key terms of modern science: energy and information, and role of the psyche in their exchange.
- Methodology/approach constitutes five principles: any object exists as a structured consistent flow of energy and information and is in the permanent inner and outer exchange; energy transforms permanently into information and vice versa; exchanged processes creates clusters named levels of virtualization; the psyche is an independent physical force that creatively forms and regulates information-energy exchange, moving between levels of virtualization and driving meanings.
- Results apply the mentioned principles for revision of legal ecosystem, namely principles of regulation, especially freedom of interpretation as the tool for dividing the energy-informational flow into fragments shaped by the meaning nucleus (ethics, science and religion are sources of such meanings). These fragments constitute a transforming circle of subjects and objects of law relations (subjectivity of artificial intelligence; uber-phenomena and cryptocurrency as objects). The efficient and ethics regulative environment, tools and sources are based on collective consciousness, crowdsourcing, customs development.
- Discussion section/research limitations are caused by format of conceptual paper: many applied aspects were voluntarily ignored.
- Practical/social implication is in inspiring to rethinking of the basic legal constructs for the ethics legal (including Web) regulation development.
- Originality/value is in a synthetic approach on intercrossing of jurisprudence, psychology and informational technologies that let organize energy-informational exchange flow in efficient way.
Keyword
Full Text
PDF (English)Riferimenti bibliografici
Allen, B. Stacey, B. C. Bar-Yam, Y. (2014), “An Information-Theoretic Formalism for Multiscale Structure in Complex Systems”, available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.4708 [cond-mat.stat-mech] (accessed 01 May 2019).
Banerjee, S. (2018), “A framework for designing compassionate and ethical artificial intelligence and artificial consciousness”, available at: https://peerj.com/preprints/3502/ (accessed 01 May 2019).
Burri, T. (2018), “The EU is right to refuse legal personality for Artificial Intelligence”, available at: https://www.euractiv.com/section/digital/opinion/the-eu-is-right-to-refuse-legal-personality-for-artificial-intelligence/ (accessed 01 May 2019).
Damasio, A. (2010), Self Comes to Mind. Constructing the Conscious Brain, Pantheon Books, New York.
Ermann, G. (2019), “7 комиков, которые ушли в большую политику (7 comics who went to the big politics)” (in Russian), available at: https://www.bbc.com/ukrainian/features-russian-46759206 (accessed 01 May 2019).
European Commission (2018), “Communication Artificial Intelligence for Europe”, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/communication-artificial-intelligence-europe (accessed 01 May 2019).
European Parliament (2017), “European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL))”, available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&reference=P8-TA-2017-0051&language=EN&ring=A8-2017-0005#BKMD-12 (accessed 01 May 2019).
Federal Ethics Committee on Non-Human Biotechnology ECNH (2019), “The dignity of living beings with regard to plants. Moral consideration of plants for their own sake”, available at: https://www.ekah.admin.ch/inhalte/_migrated/content_uploads/e-Broschure-Wurde-Pflanze-2008.pdf (accessed 01 May 2019); “Dignity of living beings”, available at: https://www.ekah.admin.ch/en/topics/dignity-of-living-beings/ (accessed 01 May 2019).
Harvey, D. (2017), Collisions in the Digital Paradigm: Law and Rule Making in the Internet Age, Hart Publishing, Oxford.
Hidalgo, C. (2016), Why Information Grows: The Evolution of Order, from Atoms to Economies, Eksmo, Moscow.
Holmes, J. (2016), Nonsense: The Power of Not Knowing, Broadway Books, NY.
Hsu, A. (2017), “Could The Best Memory System Be One That Forgets?”, available at: https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2017/06/23/534001592/could-the-best-memory-system-be-one-that-forgets (accessed 01 May 2019).
Ito, J., Howe, J. (2016), Whiplash: how to survive our faster future, Grand Central Publishing, New York.
Justia US Law (2018), “Matter of Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. v Lavery”, available at: https://law.justia.com/cases/new-york/court-of-appeals/2018/2018-268.html (accessed 01 May 2019).
Kahneman, D. (2011), Thinking, Fast and Slow, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York.
Kao, A. B., Couzin, I. D. (2019), “Modular structure within groups causes information loss but can improve decision accuracy”, available at: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2018.0378 (accessed 01 May 2019).
Kelly, K. (2017), The Inevitable. Understanding the 12 Technological Forces That Will Shape Our Future, Penguin Books, New York.
Kolchincky, A., Wolpert, D. H. (2018), “Semantic information, autonomous agency, and nonequilibrium statistical physics”, available at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1806.08053.pdf (accessed 01 May 2019).
Marchant, G. (2019), ““Soft Law” Governance of Artificial Intelligence”, available at: https://aipulse.org/soft-law-governance-of-artificial-intelligence/ (accessed 01 May 2019).
Merriam-Webster Dictionary (2019), available at: https://www.merriam-webster.com/ (accessed 01 May 2019).
Nicolis, G., Prigogine, I. (1977), Self-Organization In Nonequilibrium Systems. From Dissipative Structures to Order through Fluctuations, John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York.
Noveck, B. S. (2010), Wiki Government: How Technology Can Make Government Better, Democracy Stronger, and Citizens More Powerful, Brookings Institution Press, Washington.
Online Etymology Dictionary (2019), available at: https://www.etymonline.com/ (accessed 01 May 2019).
Polanski, P. P. (2007), Customary Law of the Internet – In the Search for a Supranational Cyberspace Law, T.M.C. ASSER PRESS, The Hague.
Shi, F., Teplitskiy, M., Duede, E., Evans, J. A, (2019), “The wisdom of polarized crowds”, available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-019-0541-6.epdf?author_access_token=OBbRz4-TlWv-jI-C45Zh8NRgN0jAjWel9jnR3ZoTv0OiMcmZk1otetPVC1EgJIIYkf4BJ1F74E1duh93_syk-pw2d96grsA473E7fo_WRDbEdPtDBzzkn3Jyt7yGsNSpkklxqjkI1Fvvuw8MHqiyFw%3D%3D (accessed 01 May 2019).
Sloman, S., Fernbach, P. (2018), The Knowledge Illusion: Why We Never Think Alone, Yakaboo Publishing, Kyiv.
Sole´, R., Moses, M., Forrest, S. (2019), “Liquid brains, solid brains”, available at: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rstb.2019.0040 (accessed 01 May 2019).
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2003, current edition), “Civil Code of Ukraine” (in Ukrainian), available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15?lang=en (accessed 01 May 2019).
Wheeler, J. A. (1990), “Information, physics, quantum: The search for links. Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information”, available at: http://cqi.inf.usi.ch/qic/wheeler.pdf (accessed 01 May 2019).
Wiener, N. (1985), Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine, The M.I.T. Press, Cambridge.
Wikipedia (2019), available at: https://www.wikipedia.org/ (accessed 01 May 2019).
Wray, L. R. (2016), Why Minsky matters. An introduction to the work of a Maverick Economist, Princeton university press, Princeton.
Refback
- Non ci sono refbacks, per ora.
ISSN: 2035-4630, Open-acess, peer-reviewed Journal, Tribunale di Roma 142/09, 04/05/09 - dir. responsabile: G. Colajacomo
Creative Commons - BY-NC-SA 4.0
